Protecting children from harmful online content is a worthwhile goal, especially during their developmental years. However, the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) goes too far by enabling potential censorship of marginalized communities rather than fostering healthy online behavior.
KOSA would give broad powers to regulators — some of whom have already demonstrated a desire to censor LGBTQ+ content — to determine what constitutes “harmful” content for minors without clear guidelines. This could eliminate vital resources that LGBTQ+ youth depend on.
The unprecedented authority to censor online content is a serious concern. Polling shows that over 60% of LGBTQ+ adults joined online platforms before they were 18, primarily to access LGBTQ+ resources and to find community support. For them, these platforms are vital spaces to connect and share experiences, especially for those who can’t do so with their own families and communities.
Additionally, we must consider the mental health and wellness of these individuals.
According to a 2022 survey from the Trevor Project, over 40% of LGBTQ+ youth in Minnesota have considered suicide. Restricting access to online resources or support communities could further isolate these vulnerable young people.
Therefore, Minnesota’s representatives in Washington, D.C., should carefully consider the potential consequences of KOSA. Passing this act in its current form would restrict LGBTQ+ youth’s access to supportive online communities — ultimately harming rather than protecting them.
Bridget Klosterman is a children’s advocate at Minnesota Nonprofit Capital Management Services.